From Britain to the US and France, political leaders are clamping down on the bankers’ bonus culture they say helped cause the credit crunch — but some experts warn this could be counterproductive.
The screw-tightening comes amid public fury at big payouts — thousands of people have joined groups on the Facebook Internet site with names like “Bankers Are Leaches,” “Impudence: The Act Of UBS Bank” and “No Ifs, No Buts — Give Up The Bonus, RBS.”
But taking too tough a line with banks could have unintended consequences for taxpayers according to academics and insiders, who say the risks include banks losing their best staff and their share prices falling even lower.
Scenting public anger, political leaders worldwide have had harsh words for bankers who handed out hefty rewards even as the world economy started to tank.
US President Barack Obama last month branded the behavior of Wall Street bankers “shameful” and is imposing a US$500,000 salary cap on executives at firms that have received a Treasury bailout.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has pledged to end the “short-term bonus culture” and backs a “clawback” system, under which bankers may have to pay back historic bonuses if it turns out they made bad decisions.
His government has announced a review of bank governance, including bonuses.
Meanwhile, French President Nicolas Sarkozy has told bank bosses to forgo bonuses for last year as a condition of receiving state loans, while a new code of conduct for traders’ salaries is being introduced.
But experts warn clamping down too hard could have some adverse effects, starting with the best bankers quitting state-owned employers in search of better bonuses at privately owned competitors.
Peter Hahn, a fellow at Cass Business School in London and former senior Citigroup banker, used the example of Britain’s Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), now 68 percent state-owned, to show how a flight of talent may work.
“If I’m Barclays or HSBC or anyone who’s got by without state money, if I was a CEO, I would send an order down and say ‘What’s RBS good at?’” Hahn said. “I’d pick off all the people who aren’t going to get bonuses.”
David Marsden, professor of industrial relations at the London School of Economics, agreed.
“The big unknowns about capping relate to the ability of the capped banks to recruit and retain their star dealers and managers if other banks do not cap bonuses,” he said.
Caps at state-controlled banks could also affect the way staff take decisions there, again with implications for their de facto owners, the taxpayer.
Hahn said it was important for banks to “take the right kind of risk.”
“If you’re the head of a major bank and you don’t get paid for risk, your incentive is just to be ridiculously conservative,” he said.
“You want banks to understand and regulate risks but you want them to take risks because that funds growth in the economy,” he said.
Some argue that, when the upturn does finally come, banks that are majority state-owned may be in a downward spiral and ill placed to capitalize on it. This would make it hard for governments to sell on their stakes and recoup their money.
“Be careful not to let your desire to punish City boys get in the way of clear thinking,” former Cantor Fitzgerald trader Venetia Thompson wrote in Britain’s Spectator magazine this month.
“It is the new owners of these public sector banks, the taxpayer ... who will ultimately lose out,” she wrote.
“Their shares will continue to plummet and ultimately result in costing the government and the taxpayer even more,” she wrote.
Others say that, despite all the political heat and light they have attracted, bonuses are only part of a much bigger problem.
“Bonuses are important but we must not let them distract attention from reform of the whole business,” Marsden said.
“One has to ask also why other management control systems were not functioning properly,” Marsden said.
PROTECTION: The investigation, which takes aim at exporters such as Canada, Germany and Brazil, came days after Trump unveiled tariff hikes on steel and aluminum products US President Donald Trump on Saturday ordered a probe into potential tariffs on lumber imports — a move threatening to stoke trade tensions — while also pushing for a domestic supply boost. Trump signed an executive order instructing US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick to begin an investigation “to determine the effects on the national security of imports of timber, lumber and their derivative products.” The study might result in new tariffs being imposed, which would pile on top of existing levies. The investigation takes aim at exporters like Canada, Germany and Brazil, with White House officials earlier accusing these economies of
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) would not produce its most advanced technologies in the US next year, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the comment during an appearance at the legislature, hours after the chipmaker announced that it would invest an additional US$100 billion to expand its manufacturing operations in the US. Asked by Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) if TSMC would allow its most advanced technologies, the yet-to-be-released 2-nanometer and 1.6-nanometer processes, to go to the US in the near term, Kuo denied it. TSMC recently opened its first US factory, which produces 4-nanometer
Teleperformance SE, the largest call-center operator in the world, is rolling out an artificial intelligence (AI) system that softens English-speaking Indian workers’ accents in real time in a move the company claims would make them more understandable. The technology, called accent translation, coupled with background noise cancelation, is being deployed in call centers in India, where workers provide customer support to some of Teleperformance’s international clients. The company provides outsourced customer support and content moderation to global companies including Apple Inc, ByteDance Ltd’s (字節跳動) TikTok and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. “When you have an Indian agent on the line, sometimes it’s hard
‘SACRED MOUNTAIN’: The chipmaker can form joint ventures abroad, except in China, but like other firms, it needs government approval for large investments Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) needs government permission for any overseas joint ventures (JVs), but there are no restrictions on making the most advanced chips overseas other than for China, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. US media have said that TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker and a major supplier to companies such as Apple Inc and Nvidia Corp, has been in talks for a stake in Intel Corp. Neither company has confirmed the talks, but US President Donald Trump has accused Taiwan of taking away the US’ semiconductor business and said he wants the industry back