In these difficult times, it was felt, an extravagant staff Christmas party would be inappropriate, and so the event planned by a leading City of London investment bank in a smart West End restaurant was canceled earlier this month. So concerned was the bank about appearing insensitive, in fact, that when it promptly rebooked the same restaurant, it did so under the name of a small-town cricket club.
Though the bank will not confirm it, for many the rumor circulating in the City, the British capital’s financial district, this week has a ring of plausibility. Institutions are facing fierce criticism for anything resembling fat-cat excess. HBOS was slammed for an internal award ceremony in Edinburgh this month described as a “Roman feast,” while RBS was accused of squandering £300,000 (US$440,000) on a “secret weekend champagne junket” for executives. Lloyds TSB has attracted criticism for a “lavish party for high-rolling foreign investors” at Gleneagles.
Little wonder they have been falling over themselves to show their restraint. Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and Barclays Capital have all canceled Christmas events; RBS has imposed a strict budget of £10 for each staff member (though with 100,000, that is still £1 million in parties). Lloyds TSB has imposed an “absolute maximum” of £35 a person — “that’s regardless of seniority.”
Northern Rock will be having no large-scale funded parties.
“As you would expect, we have gone through quite a lot of changes on this score over the past year,” a spokeswoman said.
But while banks may be reluctant to subsidize their staff’s sub-mistletoe indiscretions they have not eliminated all festive cheer. In some parts of the corporate hospitality sector, business is booming as struggling institutions work to hang on to the clients they have.
“We have certainly noticed the impact of the credit crunch, but it’s certainly not all doom and gloom,” said Chris Bruton, chief executive of corporate hospitality group Cavendish. “We have more sales for events for 2009 than we did at this time last year.”
He thanks in particular next year’s Ashes but also the current rugby internationals. Two banks have booked with his firm to bring “a substantial number” to upcoming matches.
Because large parties are booked up to a year in advance, said Ruth Lawton-Owen at the events caterer Moving Venue, canceling can be a false economy.
“A lot of these banks have paid their deposits for these events, and they remain liable. So it really would be a gross waste of money to throw away what would be many thousands of pounds,” she said.
Sure enough, both RBS and HBOS were this week accused of waste by canceling events.
“We are damned if we do,” RBS said in reply, “and damned if we don’t.”
GEOPOLITICAL ISSUES? The economics ministry said that political factors should not affect supply chains linking global satellite firms and Taiwanese manufacturers Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) asked Taiwanese suppliers to transfer manufacturing out of Taiwan, leading to some relocating portions of their supply chain, according to sources employed by and close to the equipment makers and corporate documents. A source at a company that is one of the numerous subcontractors that provide components for SpaceX’s Starlink satellite Internet products said that SpaceX asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan because of geopolitical risks, pushing at least one to move production to Vietnam. A second source who collaborates with Taiwanese satellite component makers in the nation said that suppliers were directly
Top Taiwanese officials yesterday moved to ease concern about the potential fallout of Donald Trump’s return to the White House, making a case that the technology restrictions promised by the former US president against China would outweigh the risks to the island. The prospect of Trump’s victory in this week’s election is a worry for Taipei given the Republican nominee in the past cast doubt over the US commitment to defend it from Beijing. But other policies championed by Trump toward China hold some appeal for Taiwan. National Development Council Minister Paul Liu (劉鏡清) described the proposed technology curbs as potentially having
EXPORT CONTROLS: US lawmakers have grown more concerned that the US Department of Commerce might not be aggressively enforcing its chip restrictions The US on Friday said it imposed a US$500,000 penalty on New York-based GlobalFoundries Inc, the world’s third-largest contract chipmaker, for shipping chips without authorization to an affiliate of blacklisted Chinese chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC, 中芯). The US Department of Commerce in a statement said GlobalFoundries sent 74 shipments worth US$17.1 million to SJ Semiconductor Corp (盛合晶微半導體), an affiliate of SMIC, without seeking a license. Both SMIC and SJ Semiconductor were added to the department’s trade restriction Entity List in 2020 over SMIC’s alleged ties to the Chinese military-industrial complex. SMIC has denied wrongdoing. Exports to firms on the list
TALENT FACTOR: The nation’s chip sector would be difficult to replace, but to maintain that advantage, Taiwan must retain skilled workers, an academic said A group of experts on Sunday called on Taiwan to strive to maintain its world-leading position in the semiconductor industry, with a US-China chip dispute expected to continue regardless of who becomes the next US president. Tamkang University Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies director Li Da-jung (李大中) said at a Taipei seminar on global semiconductor security that the relationship between the two superpowers would remain confrontational. There appears to be “no turning back” in US-China relations, as US presidential candidates US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump are both expected to continue Washington’s hawkish stance