Battle lines are being drawn after India’s telecoms regulator called for full-blown telephone services via the Internet, paving the way for another fall in the nation’s already cheap call rates.
India’s Internet service providers (ISP) are delighted at the prospect of a new revenue stream, but fixed line and mobile players are objecting that they paid high market entry fees, whereas ISPs will not have to stump up any money.
Under the plan proposed this week by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of India, people could call from their personal computers with Internet connections to a land line or a mobile phone and vice versa.
The move could ring in another big drop in call prices in the world’s fastest-growing phone market, where consumers already enjoy some of the lowest telephone costs, the regulator said.
The proposal is aimed at putting India’s telecoms sector “in tune with global trends” in which such “Internet-based services are very popular” and boosting paltry broadband penetration, the regulator said.
The government is keen to boost broadband use, especially in poverty-hit rural areas, where the Internet is seen as key to development.
But Cellular Operators Association of India chief T.V. Ramachandran said the regulator’s proposal was not fair to existing telephone companies.
“There should be a level playing field ... it’s unfair to allow unrestricted Internet telephony to ISPs at no additional cost,” he said.
The telecommunications department just recently issued pan-India licenses to several telecoms players, charging each an entry fee of 16.5 billion rupees (US$37.7 million).
India’s largest phone company, state-run Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, said the entry of ISPs would hurt revenues.
Under the regulator’s plan, international call rates via the Internet could drop to one or two rupees a minute from the average seven, while national long-distance rates could fall to less than half a rupee.
Local calls could be virtually free.
But experts say it would take a long time for broadband subscribers to pose a threat to fixed-line and mobile license holders, given India’s low Internet penetration rate.
India has just 4.38 million broadband subscribers, while there are 287 million mobile users and 38.9 million land line subscribers.
Internet telephony could be “the killer application” to boost broadband penetration, which has “lagged far behind the very successful mobile telephony,” Internet Service Providers Association of India head Rajesh Chharia said.
Analysts are betting that the government will go ahead with the idea.
“The government has been pushing reforms in telecoms, I think they’ll give it the green light,” said an expert at an international consultancy, who did not wish to be named.
The regulator said telecoms companies have no reason to fear. ISPs rely on lines leased from telecoms companies to carry their signals, so they have to sign deals with existing license holders.
The regulator calls it a win-win situation as 85 percent of an ISP’s revenue is earmarked for resources mainly from telecoms license holders.
“In other words, an increase in the ISPs’ business will also result in a boom for existing telcos. Given this scenario, the government would do well to accept [the regulator’s] recommendations,” an editorial in the Business Standard said.
DOLLAR CHALLENGE: BRICS countries’ growing share of global GDP threatens the US dollar’s dominance, which some member states seek to displace for world trade US president-elect Donald Trump on Saturday threatened 100 percent tariffs against a bloc of nine nations if they act to undermine the US dollar. His threat was directed at countries in the so-called BRICS alliance, which consists of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Turkey, Azerbaijan and Malaysia have applied to become members and several other countries have expressed interest in joining. While the US dollar is by far the most-used currency in global business and has survived past challenges to its preeminence, members of the alliance and other developing nations say they are fed
LIMITED MEASURES: The proposed restrictions on Chinese chip exports are weaker than previously considered, following lobbying by major US firms, sources said US President Joe Biden’s administration is weighing additional curbs on sales of semiconductor equipment and artificial intelligence (AI) memory chips to China that would escalate the US crackdown on Beijing’s tech ambitions, but stop short of some stricter measures previously considered, said sources familiar with the matter. The restrictions could be unveiled as soon as next week, said the sources, who emphasized that the timing and contours of the rules have changed several times, and that nothing is final until they are published. The measures follow months of deliberations by US officials, negotiations with allies in Japan and the Netherlands, and
Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團) yesterday said it expects any impact of new tariffs from US president-elect Donald Trump to hit the company less than its rivals, citing its global manufacturing footprint. Young Liu (劉揚偉), chairman of the contract manufacturer and key Apple Inc supplier, told reporters after a forum in Taipei that it saw the primary impact of any fresh tariffs falling on its clients because its business model is based on contract manufacturing. “Clients may decide to shift production locations, but looking at Foxconn’s global footprint, we are ahead. As a result, the impact on us is likely smaller compared to
TECH COMPETITION: The US restricted sales of two dozen types of manufacturing equipment and three software tools, and blacklisted 140 more Chinese entities US President Joe Biden’s administration unveiled new restrictions on China’s access to vital components for chips and artificial intelligence (AI), escalating a campaign to contain Beijing’s technological ambitions. The US Department of Commerce slapped additional curbs on the sale of high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and chipmaking gear, including that produced by US firms at foreign facilities. It also blacklisted 140 more Chinese entities that it accused of acting on Beijing’s behalf, although it did not name them in an initial statement. Full details on the new sanctions and Entity List additions were to be published later yesterday, a US official said. The US “will