The Cabinet’s economic “stimulus package” cleared its first reading by legislative committees on Monday, but lawmakers and academics yesterday remained skeptical about how effective the plan would be in expanding domestic demand and reining in inflation.
The Cabinet has said the NT$130.1 billion (US$4.28 billion) spending program, together with a supplementary budget, could push the nation’s economy up by 0.45 percent, in addition to easing the impact of rising commodity and fuel prices.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) said he doubted the Cabinet’s claim, as the bulk of the special fund, NT$66.8 billion, would be channeled to local governments to finance minor public works projects and absorb price hikes in construction materials.
“Insignificant public works projects can do little to stimulate economic growth,” Huang said. “The increased government spending is more likely to drive commodity prices higher than keep them down. The new government can at least learn to spend less if it does not know how to make more money.”
Huang also voiced concern that the spending package might add to the nation’s financial burden after the legislature scrapped the proposed sale of government shares in Chunghwa Telecom Co (中華電信), forcing the Ministry of Finance to agree to borrow an extra NT$52.8 billion to fill the gap.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lee Hung-chun (李鴻均), a vehement opponent of the sale, said the government would risk losing control of the company and the ability to set prices for a business involving public interests.
The planned sale would reduce the government’s stake in Chunghwa by 6.9 percent to below the 34 percent level that Lee and other party lawmakers consider optimal. Currently, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications owns a 35.63 percent stake in Chunghwa, whose capital stands at NT$95.58 billion.
Lee said borrowing money was not a better solution and that the root of the problem lay in the necessity and relevance of the program.
“I don’t think the package can really help expand domestic demand or boost the economy,” Lee said by telephone.
“Still, I will toe the party line when it comes to voting,” Lee said.
The extra debt is estimated to cost the government NT$1.37 billion in interest a year.
Minister of Finance Lee Sush-der (李述德) said this amount would not have an unbearable impact on the nation’s finances, although he previously promoted the sale of Chunghwa shares as the best way to raise funds.
Norman Yin (殷乃平), a professor at National Chengchi University’s Department of Money and Banking, said that, since reclaiming power, KMT officials appeared to be pursuing contradictory approaches in dealing with public debt.
While it was an opposition party, Yin said, the KMT had criticized the former DPP administration for wasting tax dollars on unworthy construction programs, but now it was engaging in similar practices.
“It is odd for the government to seek to galvanize the economy by spending money on dead people,” said Yin, alluding to Taichung City’s proposal to construct funeral facilities with its share of the funding.
The special budget is expected to quickly pass its second and third readings before the end of the current legislative session, because the KMT controls more than two-thirds of the seats in the body.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process