The rapid appreciation of the Chinese currency against the US dollar is taking a big toll on Asian companies using China as a base for exports to the US, a top US business official said.
The yuan has risen 18 percent against the dollar since China abandoned a peg in July 2005, and the currency breached a key psychological level of 7 yuan to US$1 on April 10.
The higher yuan makes US exports more competitive with Chinese goods in their home market, while business costs for largely Asian companies producing and exporting from China will rise as they pay more local currency for labor and raw materials and sell their products to the US market in dollars.
Meanwhile US firms manufacturing inside China, most of which aim their goods for the huge Chinese domestic market, are not as greatly affected, said US-China Business Council president John Frisbie.
“I think it is probably a bigger issue for all those companies from other economies in Asia that have invested in China for the US market,” he said. “And that’s companies from Japan, [South] Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore.”
Frisbie said many Asian companies selling to the US market had shifted their production to China over the last 10 years or so to be more cost-competitive.
“I’m sure for them, the exchange rate change and other cost increases happening in China now are having an impact. That is a different set of companies than US companies, most of which invested in China for the China market,” he said.
Aside from the falling dollar, the Asian companies are also reeling from the effects of a weakening US demand on the back of an economic slowdown, reports said.
The dollar has fallen about 4 percent to the yuan so far this year, after dropping 7 percent last year.
The yuan’s rise, partly permitted by Beijing to contain soaring inflation, is a bit of an irony.
Beijing has been accused for years by Washington of controlling the yuan’s direction and keeping it low against the dollar to make Chinese goods more competitive in the global market.
US lawmakers particularly had threatened to impose sanctions on China as the US trade deficit with the world’s most populous nation sank deeper into the red.
Frisbie said that his council’s view on the yuan exchange rate had been consistent in that “the best determinant of its true value should be the market.”
The prices of China-made goods in the US have gone up, but not as much as the yuan appreciation, while Chinese exports are growing much less rapidly, said Nicholas Lardy, a China expert at the Washington-based Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Lardy said while the salience of the yuan issue in the US Congress had diminished amid the Chinese currency’s appreciation, the “underlying concern” over China’s massive current account surplus remained.
“We should not be looking at the bilateral renminbi [yuan]-dollar rate but at the renminbi vis-a-vis a trade-weighted basket of currencies of China’s trading partners,” he said.
Since mid-2005, the yuan has appreciated by 18 percent against the dollar but “it only rose by 10 percent on a trade weighted basis and this is not going to make a dent on that massive surplus,” Lardy said.
China recorded an enormous current account surplus of US$378 billion last year, or 12 percent of its GDP.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process