For many in Asia, the brief spate of market turmoil this week following Thailand's decision to defend its currency by setting limits on foreign investments was eerily familiar.
Nearly a decade ago, a crisis over the Thai baht dragged much of region into recession.
But for now, there seems little likelihood of an Asia-wide financial crisis similar to that triggered by a plunge in the baht in July 1997. Nearly a decade on, regional banks and economies are far more robust and better managed than back then.
PHOTO: AFP
"The risk levels for the two periods are incomparable," says economist Somchai Jitsuchon at the Thailand Development Research Institute, an independent think-tank.
In the go-go 1990s, many Asian countries were carrying huge overhangs of foreign debt. Crony capitalism trumped risk management at many regional financial institutions.
"There will be more problems, but it will not be like the crisis in 1997," said Sompop Manarangsan, an economist at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University.
"[Back in the late 1990s] we had over-investment, over-consumption and over-borrowing and the macro-indicators were bad," he said.
Thailand, for example, had big trade and current account deficits. But now, the country runs a robust trade surplus and has nearly US$65 billion in foreign currency reserves, far more than it did in 1997.
Back then, the baht plunged in value, kindling speculative pressures that forced other nations in the region to allow their currencies to fall as well, making it difficult to repay dollar-denominated debts.
But this time, Thai authorities acted because the baht was judged to be too strong. Before Monday, it had gained 13 percent against the dollar this year, the most of any regional currency.
And although Thai manufacturers gripe about the strong baht, which makes their products more expensive overseas, exports are up about 20 percent this year.
In South Korea, the 1997 crisis hit hard -- but it also forced the country to reform its heavily indebted family-owned conglomerates, streamline its banking sector and improve the transparency of its corporations.
Indonesia, bankrupted and propelled into political upheaval by the crisis, now has foreign reserves worth US$42 billion. It plans to repay what it owes the IMF for a multibillion-dollar bailout ahead of schedule.
Still, Asia's rapid economic growth makes it a magnet for inflows of capital seeking high returns -- and that can become problematic.
For one, it's lifted Asian currencies like the Korean won, Thai baht, Philippine peso and Indonesian rupiah against the US dollar, hurting exporters.
It also makes those nations vulnerable to speculative pressures given the huge amount of money chasing investments in emerging markets, driving up stock and property prices as well as regional currencies.
"The problem is that financial markets have become so big and a currency like the Thai baht is so small the market can put it anywhere it wants to," says Andy Xie (
"A small country has a huge problem now," Xie says.
In the weeks leading up to Monday's announcement of foreign investment controls aimed at fending off the inflow of money, Thailand's central bank governor Tarisa Watanagase complained that broad dollar weakness was the key problem.
Others point to China's refusal to let its own currency, the yuan, appreciate faster against the US dollar.
The yuan has gained just 3.6 percent against the dollar since its revaluation in July last year.
Another factor is the so-called "carry trade," which involves heavy yen-denominated borrowing, thanks to Japan's low 0.25 percent interest rate, for investments in higher-yielding countries like Thailand, where the benchmark interest rate is 5 percent.
"Investors just jumped on that as easy money on the table," says Jonathan Anderson, chief Asia economist for the UBS brokerage in Hong Kong.
The conditions made it "very easy and attractive to speculate on the currency, so you get a virtuous or vicious circle, depending on whether you're an investor or a policy maker," he says.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process