With the hottest days of summer fast approaching, Shanghai is making preparations to seed clouds over the city in order to make it rain, in the hope that a couple of degrees of reduced temperatures will help ward off brownouts, or worse, here in China's commercial capital.
Even now, city inspection teams are visiting factories, identifying the least efficient energy consumers, possibly to be closed down for a time, and thermostats are being raised in public offices. City officials say they are even contemplating shutting down the huge flashing advertising signs that made the Bund, or downtown river front in Shanghai, China's largest city, the neon equivalent of Times Square.
With China projecting a 20-million-kilowatt shortfall in electricity supplies this year, actions like these are anything but isolated. With severe power shortages predicted for the country's southern and eastern regions, Guangzhou, China's third largest city, an industrial powerhouse, has had rationing since January, six months earlier than the emergency measures put into effect last year.
Discussions about China these days are often dominated by economic terms like "overheating," and "hard versus soft landings."
What is described as being at issue, typically, is whether the country's leaders can continue to successfully manage this huge and increasingly complex economy at growth rates that are among the world's fastest.
The rush to find short-term, sometimes even fanciful-sounding, palliatives for the country's immense power crunch, however, reflects creeping doubts of a more profound order. These concerns have recently been expressed even at the level of China's normally serene and self-confident-sounding senior officials.
The worry, put bluntly, is that the world simply may not have enough energy and other resources for China to continue developing along present lines, especially at its present rate. Furthermore, sharply increased environmental damage might make the country unlivable, even if such growth could be sustained.
China's predicament is reflected in a simple statistic: This country is already the world's second-largest consumer of energy, and yet on a per capita basis, the Chinese consume scarcely 10 percent of the energy used by Americans.
In material terms, the contemporary Chinese dream is not so different from the traditional American dream, of spacious homes full of power-consuming appliances and a car or two in the driveway, and therein lies the source of concern for the country's leaders -- and indeed for the world. As urbanization gathers pace here, there is a growing sense that such dreams will collide with intractable limits.
"If we use the patterns of today, China cannot double its economy," said Chen Jinhai, director of the Shanghai provincial government's Energy Commission and Environmental Protection Department. "We would need the energy of Mars or other planets. Our consumption may still be less than the U.S. or Japan, but the key for our future will have to be greater efficiency."
Chen is far from a lone voice speaking about the severe environmental and resource limitations that will challenge this country's seemingly irresistible rise of late. Indeed, his perspective echoes that of senior policy makers in Beijing.
"If we continue with the massive consumption of resources, shortages will only get worse, it will become very hard to maintain stable, high-speed growth, and the economy risks declining greatly," wrote Ma Kai, director of the State Development and Reform Commission, in a sobering recent article in People's Daily, the Communist Party newspaper. "Now we are at a key point in the industrialization and urbanization process. If we don't transform our economic model, we could lose the ability to grow."
According to Zhang Jun, a prominent Chinese economist who has made a comparative study of China and India, China consumes three times the energy and 15 times the amount of steel as its neighbor, even though the Chinese economy is only roughly twice as large, and is growing only about 10 percent faster than India's.
Part of this picture comes from an intensive focus on manufacturing and exports, which many economists say has led to over-industrialization and empty growth. A lot of the responsibility for wastefulness can be laid to duplication, with each province -- and indeed many city governments -- simultaneously pushing for the same kind of growth, based on industrial parks and manufacturing zones. The municipalities that boast of becoming China's Silicon Valley, to take one common example of this trend, are almost too numerous to count.
"China will definitely be facing a huge, huge challenge in a decade or so if the growth patterns don't change," said Zhang, who is the director of the China Center for Economic Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai. "Ours is an extreme case of the East Asian model, and we are coming quickly toward the limitations in terms of the way we use energy, in terms of the environment, and even in terms of labor."
TRADE WAR: Tariffs should also apply to any goods that pass through the new Beijing-funded port in Chancay, Peru, an adviser to US president-elect Donald Trump said A veteran adviser to US president-elect Donald Trump is proposing that the 60 percent tariffs that Trump vowed to impose on Chinese goods also apply to goods from any country that pass through a new port that Beijing has built in Peru. The duties should apply to goods from China or countries in South America that pass through the new deep-water port Chancay, a town 60km north of Lima, said Mauricio Claver-Carone, an adviser to the Trump transition team who served as senior director for the western hemisphere on the White House National Security Council in his first administration. “Any product going
TECH SECURITY: The deal assures that ‘some of the most sought-after technology on the planet’ returns to the US, US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo said The administration of US President Joe Biden finalized its CHIPS Act incentive awards for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), marking a major milestone for a program meant to bring semiconductor production back to US soil. TSMC would get US$6.6 billion in grants as part of the contract, the US Department of Commerce said in a statement yesterday. Though the amount was disclosed earlier this year as part of a preliminary agreement, the deal is now legally binding — making it the first major CHIPS Act award to reach this stage. The chipmaker, which is also taking up to US$5 billion
High above the sparkling surface of the Athens coastline, the cranes for building the 50-floor luxury tower centerpiece of Greece’s future “smart city” look out over the Saronic Gulf. At their feet, construction machinery stirs up dust. Its backers say the 8 billion euro (US$8.43 billion) project financed by private funds is a symbol of Greece’s renaissance after the years of financial stagnation that saw investors flee the country. However, critics see it more as a future “ghetto for the rich.” It is hard to imagine that 10km from the Acropolis, a new city “three times the size of Monaco”
STRUGGLING BUSINESS: South Korea’s biggest company and semiconductor manufacturer’s buyback fuels concerns that it could be missing out on the AI boom Samsung Electronics Co plans to buy back about 10 trillion won (US$7.2 billion) of its own stock over the next year, putting in motion one of the larger shareholder return programs in its history. South Korea’s biggest company would repurchase the stock in stages over the coming 12 months, it said in a regulatory filing on Friday. As a first step, it would buy back about 3 trillion won of paper starting today up until February next year, all of which it would cancel. The board would deliberate on how best to effect the remaining 7 trillion won of buybacks. The move