The Nike streaker, clad only in scarf and shoes with the swoosh, starts across the soccer field when -- surprise -- out of nowhere comes a brawny football player with a red Reebok jersey who tackles the streaker and knocks him to the ground.
This commercial -- a parody of Nike's successful streaker commercial featuring Reebok's own "Terry Tate, Office Linebacker" character -- rates as a "gotcha" for Reebok, the one-time sneaker king that spent the 1990s watching Nike's dust.
Now Reebok says it is roaring back, led by Paul Fireman, the 58-year-old CEO who transformed the company from an obscure English custom shoe business to the biggest athletic shoe company in America by 1987 -- about the same time he was kicked upstairs and replaced by C. Joseph LaBonte, a Harvard business graduate and former head of the 20th-Century Film Corp.
PHOTO: NY TIMES
"There is a certain wish for vindication," Fireman, who never graduated from college, conceded in a recent interview.
Reebok, along with the other athletic shoe companies, still trail Nike: Sporting goods intelligence, a trade newsletter, estimated that, at the end of last year, Nike had 39.1 percent of the nation's athletic shoe business; Reebok had 12; New Balance had 11.6; and Adidas had 9.6 percent.
But analysts say Reebok has a good chance to at least double its share in the next few years. Since Fireman regained day-to-day control in November 1999, the Canton, Massachusetts, company has increased sales, increased cash and increased exposure.
In the fourth quarter of 2002, Reebok's total sales increased a better-than-expected 14.8 percent, to US$763 million. Clothing sales in the US grew 48.1 percent, to US$145 million. According to a Lehman Brothers report on Feb. 5, Reebok has had 11 consecutive quarters of sales increases.
"We are the No. 2 company in America," Fireman said. But ranking, he said, is not his priority.
"Right now, I'm not sure I want to surpass Nike's volume -- we did that once," Fireman said.
"As much as I want to be the No. 1 aspirational brand, we're on a good path now and if this escalates into a competition between Nike and ourselves and Adidas, then I'm happy with that, too."
Right now, Reebok is rushing to fill the empty shelves in the US' more than 2,500 Foot Lockers after Nike and Foot Locker, the world's largest athletic footwear chain, had a falling out.
In February 2002, Foot Locker told Nike the store wanted to reduce the number of Nike's marquee shoes, because it believed consumers were turning more to the mid-priced shoes.
According to a person close to the deal, Foot Locker told Nike it wanted to reduce its marquee shoes from 12 percent of the chain's business to 6 percent, and canceled US$150 million in Nike orders.
Nike struck back. Nike denied that it had pulled back on existing orders or punished Foot Locker with late shipments, as had been reported.
"But Foot Locker will no longer be a primary distribution for marquee and launch products," said Charles Denson, the president of Nike Brand, in a December call with analysts.
On Feb. 15, Nike's "Hall of Hoops" displays in the nation's Foot Locker stores were replaced by Reebok's "Above the Rim," featuring RBK shoes and jerseys and hats endorsed by Allen Iverson, the Philadelphia 76er star. Reebok has also filled the vacuum with more of its Classic line, part of the retro look that has been successful for such sneaker also-rans as Converse and Puma.
"They jumped on the retro trend, with sneakers like those sold 10 to 20 years ago -- the youth of today haven't seen them," said Matthew D. Serra, the chief executive of Foot Locker. "Retro is very hot, and Reeboks are very affordable: US$60, US$70 for most of them. We put them in, and the customers responded."
Because of the new business at Foot Locker, several analysts this week gave Reebok a good chance to increase its current 12 percent market share closer to 20 percent in the next few years.
"Obviously, the Nike-Foot Locker dispute opened the door," said John Horan, publisher of Sporting Goods Intelligence, an industry newsletter. "Both Reebok and Adidas are both going for 20 percent in the US."
Although he said he disdained rankings, Fireman has no problem with aspiring to 20 percent.
"I view this as a renaissance, a complete regrouping, a complete rebirth," Fireman said.
Fireman brought Reebok to America in 1979; in 1981, he took an English partner, Pentland Industry, run by Stephen Ruben, who got 56 percent of the common stock in exchange for US$77,500 in cash and US$300,000 in letters of credit, Fireman said.
Under his guidance, Reebok became an `980s phenomenon. In 1983, sales were US$12 million; by 1987, they were US$1.3 billion.
"It really exploded," he said. "In 1982, we introduced women's aerobic shoes -- we had running shoes up until then. In 1983, we reinvented the tennis shoe -- lightweight, cushioned, it didn't wear out." The company went public in 1985. When sales reached US$307 million, in 1991, the English partner was bought out.
Then the pendulum swung from fitness and individual sports to team sports. "Michael Jordan was famous by 1988, a basketball icon," Fireman said. "But Reebok had trouble making the transition into sports."
In 1987, the Reebok board decided it was time to let somebody else run the company and Fireman was elevated to the new position of chairman, with no responsibility for the day-to-day running of Reebok.
"All those young people, who would have climbed mountains for me, walked off a cliff for me," he said, trying not to sound bitter. "And all of us were replaced by people who were part of the package goods mentality."
Although sales continued to grow, Fireman contends the business ran out of gas, "all the emotions were gone."
Fireman came back as chief executive in November 1999, just as the stock price was approaching its nadir of around US$7. It closed at US$30.80 on Wednesday.
"The first year, we struggled to regain purpose," he said. "The second year, to retain integrity of the brand and the third year -- the question is how do we get into the game of winning, of moving to the top? We fixed the basics, built our self-esteem and built market share."
The company is now moving on multiple fronts: Besides Iverson, whom Reebok signed up six years ago, and a roster of younger basketball stars like Steve Francis of the Houston Rockets, the company has a deal with the rapper Jay-Z (although it balked at paying Kobe Bryant for an endorsement deal worth between US$4 and US$5 million). The marketing budget is now US$40 million, up 38 percent from the previous year.
In December 2000, Reebok signed a licensing contract with the NFL.
Nike still has merchandising deals with nine teams out of 26 NBA teams this year; by November 2004, it will have none. All the teams will be signed with Reebok.
But Reebok is still looking for a logo that rivals that of Nike.
"We've got this vector cross on every NFL jersey, a little square with a slant," Fireman said.
"We need our own swoosh. We need a recognizable symbol, something that gives the kid at the gym an emotional attachment."
WEAKER ACTIVITY: The sharpest deterioration was seen in the electronics and optical components sector, with the production index falling 13.2 points to 44.5 Taiwan’s manufacturing sector last month contracted for a second consecutive month, with the purchasing managers’ index (PMI) slipping to 48, reflecting ongoing caution over trade uncertainties, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. The decline reflects growing caution among companies amid uncertainty surrounding US tariffs, semiconductor duties and automotive import levies, and it is also likely linked to fading front-loading activity, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said. “Some clients have started shifting orders to Southeast Asian countries where tariff regimes are already clear,” Lien told a news conference. Firms across the supply chain are also lowering stock levels to mitigate
IN THE AIR: While most companies said they were committed to North American operations, some added that production and costs would depend on the outcome of a US trade probe Leading local contract electronics makers Wistron Corp (緯創), Quanta Computer Inc (廣達), Inventec Corp (英業達) and Compal Electronics Inc (仁寶) are to maintain their North American expansion plans, despite Washington’s 20 percent tariff on Taiwanese goods. Wistron said it has long maintained a presence in the US, while distributing production across Taiwan, North America, Southeast Asia and Europe. The company is in talks with customers to align capacity with their site preferences, a company official told the Taipei Times by telephone on Friday. The company is still in talks with clients over who would bear the tariff costs, with the outcome pending further
Six Taiwanese companies, including contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), made the 2025 Fortune Global 500 list of the world’s largest firms by revenue. In a report published by New York-based Fortune magazine on Tuesday, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), ranked highest among Taiwanese firms, placing 28th with revenue of US$213.69 billion. Up 60 spots from last year, TSMC rose to No. 126 with US$90.16 billion in revenue, followed by Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) at 348th, Pegatron Corp (和碩) at 461st, CPC Corp, Taiwan (台灣中油) at 494th and Wistron Corp (緯創) at
NEGOTIATIONS: Semiconductors play an outsized role in Taiwan’s industrial and economic development and are a major driver of the Taiwan-US trade imbalance With US President Donald Trump threatening to impose tariffs on semiconductors, Taiwan is expected to face a significant challenge, as information and communications technology (ICT) products account for more than 70 percent of its exports to the US, Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said on Friday. Compared with other countries, semiconductors play a disproportionately large role in Taiwan’s industrial and economic development, Lien said. As the sixth-largest contributor to the US trade deficit, Taiwan recorded a US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US last year — up from US$47.8 billion in 2023 — driven by strong